CatFoodLab
Articles
Guest

Porus One vs Kremezin: Choosing the Right Uremic Toxin Adsorbent

포러스원 vs 크레메진, 우리 아이에게 맞는 요독 흡착제는?

Introduction: what can a uremic-toxin adsorbent actually do?

In feline CKD we tend to focus on BUN, creatinine and SDMA. But those numbers are mostly a dashboard of how well the kidneys filter; the compounds that do direct harm are different.

The main ones are protein-bound uremic toxins such as indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS). In cats and dogs, higher blood IS has been linked to faster CKD progression (Chen 2018) — and the hope that lowering it might slow progression is where oral adsorbents come from.

💡
The bottom line first — Porus One and Kremezin are the same kind of "bind it in the gut" adsorbent. Porus One now has preliminary feline evidence that uremic-toxin levels fall, but neither has evidence that it slows progression or extends life. Treat it as an adjunct for a cat that eats well, and drop it first if it puts the cat off food.

1. Porus One vs Kremezin/Renamezin: what's the difference?

They act at the same step, on the same target: indole (the precursor of IS) made by gut bacteria is adsorbed before it can be absorbed, and leaves in the stool. What differs is the form, the regulatory status and how much feline evidence exists.

Porus OneKremezin / Renamezin
IngredientRenaltec — spherical porous carbonAST-120 — spherical carbon adsorbent
MechanismBoth adsorb uremic-toxin precursors such as indole in the gut and pass them in stool; both use pore size to take up only small molecules
Surface areaAbout 1,500 m² per g
Maker: one 500 mg sachet = 3 tennis courts (about 750 m²)
Over 1,600 m² per g
What it isA feline product (Porus GmbH, Germany; distributed by Dechra)A human prescription drug (over 30 years in Japan); Renamezin is a Korean product with the same ingredient
How it's givenPowder mixed into food (one 500 mg sachet a day)Capsules or granules, given separately or in a little food
Other drugsBoth should be given at least 2 hours apart from other oral medication — adsorbents can bind drugs too (Porus One's own guidance says the same)
What has been studied3 feline studies (1 randomised) — lower toxin levelsLower toxin levels shown in humans; in cats only one 5-cat study, too small to judge
Difference in effectBeing the same kind of material, expect a similar effect. The gap in studies reflects who paid for feline research, not a difference in effect (section 3)
⚠️
An earlier version of this article said "Porus One works before toxins form and Kremezin after" and that "Kremezin recaptures toxins returning via enterohepatic circulation". On rechecking the evidence, that was not right. Kremezin's main action is also adsorbing indole in the gut, and IS travels bound to protein in the blood and is cleared by the kidneys — returning to the gut is not its main route. (Corrected in October 2026.)

2. Where uremic toxins come from

  1. Protein intake
    Dietary protein is broken down and absorbed as amino acids in the small intestine.
  2. Undigested protein reaches the colon
    Whatever is not absorbed moves on to the large intestine.
  3. Bacterial fermentation
    Tryptophan becomes indole; tyrosine and phenylalanine become p-cresol.
  4. Where adsorbents work
    Both Porus One and Kremezin bind indole and similar compounds at this step and carry them out in stool.
  5. The liver makes the toxins
    Absorbed indole and p-cresol are converted to IS and pCS in the liver.
  6. Cleared by the kidneys
    Being protein-bound, IS and pCS are mainly secreted by the renal tubules. As kidneys fail they accumulate, and accumulation is associated with tubular inflammation and fibrosis.

So there are three levers: less protein reaching the colon (digestibility), different fermentation (fibre), and binding in the gut (adsorbents).


3. The feline evidence, in numbers

StudySubjects · designResultFunding
Porus One
2019 congress abstract
12 healthy senior cats vs 6 controls, 8 weeksIS down more than 60%Maker-linked
Porus One
Paschall 2024, Vet Sci
13 cats with experimental CKD, non-randomised, 56 daysIS −8.5% (once daily) / −30% (twice daily); pCS −16.5% / −47%Dechra donation; one author a Dechra consultant
Porus One
Elzenbeck 2026, JFMS
Randomised pilot, IRIS 2–3, 10 vs 9 controls, 6 monthsAt the end, lower IS (P=0.045), UPC (P=0.001) and faecal dysbiosis index (P=0.009). SDMA no different; 2 progressed in each groupMaker supplied product and lab costs (stated no role in analysis or writing)
Kremezin
National Taiwan University 2016
5 cats with CKD, 400 mg/day, 3 monthsNo clear change in IS or clinical values — "larger studies needed"Thesis
Kremezin
Human EPPIC trials, 2015
About 2,000 people with CKD, randomised, placeboDid not delay dialysis, transplant or doubling of creatinineManufacturer

How to read it:

  • Porus One now has evidence that lab markers fall. It is currently the only adsorbent with a randomised feline trial
  • But all three studies are linked to the maker or distributor, the largest had 19 cats, mostly stage 2, and there is no stage 4 data
  • The 2026 trial had no placebo, so everyone knew who was treated, and the Porus One group also received Add One treats, so the microbiome change cannot be pinned on either
  • Neither product has evidence for slower progression or longer life. That the same mechanism (Kremezin) failed in large human trials is another reason for modest expectations
🔍
This is not "Porus One works and Kremezin doesn't."
The two were tested on different questions. The Porus One studies asked "do toxin levels fall?" — yes. For Kremezin that answer is already yes in humans. Where Kremezin failed was the next question: "does that delay dialysis or a doubling of creatinine?" Porus One has not been tested on that yet, and in the 2026 trial SDMA and progression (2 vs 2) did not differ — the same pattern.
The difference in the number of studies is about money, not effect: Kremezin is an off-patent human drug with no company to fund cat trials, while Porus One must sell in the veterinary market and funds research. Daily doses are similar too, about 100 mg per kg for both.
✅
One of the two is enough — there is no reason to give both. Choose by what is easier to give, not by effect: Porus One if your cat eats it mixed into food, Kremezin if capsules suit you or it is already prescribed.
"One worked and the other didn't" is usually down to something else that changed at the same time — fluids, diet, recovery from dehydration, a different lab machine. The IS that adsorbents lower is not on a routine blood panel, and creatinine moves for reasons unrelated to adsorbents. To check a difference in one cat you would have to switch with everything else unchanged and compare at least twice at the same lab — and even then creatinine is a poor judge.

4. Digestibility matters more than which meat

An earlier version of this article said turkey is lower in toxin precursors such as tryptophan. Rechecked against USDA source data, lean meats turned out almost identical.

Per 100 gProteinTryptophanPer g
🍗 Chicken31.0g362mg11.7mg
🦃 Turkey29.5g364mg12.3mg
🐇 Rabbit29.1g384mg13.2mg
🐟 Tuna29.2g313mg10.7mg

Per g = tryptophan per gram of protein. Source: USDA FoodData Central (SR Legacy), roasted lean meat (chicken and turkey breast); tuna is yellowfin. Tyrosine and phenylalanine (p-cresol precursors) are similar too, at 32–41 mg per g of protein.

The spread is 10–13 mg, so switching meats gains almost nothing. The earlier turkey figures did not match the source data and have been replaced with the table above.

ℹ️
What matters more is how much protein reaches the colon. The more digestible the protein, the more is absorbed in the small intestine and the less is left to ferment. Cuts rich in connective tissue (tendon, skin) and poorly digestible foods do the opposite.

5. Cutting tryptophan backfires — amino-acid balance

A cat uses protein efficiently only when every essential amino acid is present in proportion. If lysine, leucine and methionine are at 100% but tryptophan is at 60%, overall protein use can be capped near 60%, and the surplus is broken down into BUN.

So trimming tryptophan to cut toxin precursors is counterproductive. The goal is not minimisation but balanced protein that is well digested.


6. Gut bacteria: the same meal, different toxin loads

  • Proteolytic bacteria — make indole and p-cresol
  • Saccharolytic bacteria — ferment carbohydrate and fibre and make fewer precursors

Prebiotic fibres such as FOS, GOS, inulin and resistant starch are used to tilt fermentation toward the saccharolytic side. Feline evidence that "added fibre lowered IS" is still small-scale, and too much fibre can soften stools or reduce appetite, so start low.

💡
Realistic priorities
(1) Eating enough — a cat that doesn't eat breaks down muscle and makes more uremic waste
(2) Proven care: phosphorus control, hydration, blood pressure
(3) Balanced, highly digestible protein
(4) Then, if you like, an adjunct such as an adsorbent (Porus One) — optional either way, and the first thing to drop if it puts the cat off food
Digestive enzymes were removed from this list: there is no evidence for them in CKD cats.

Related reading